Where England's local charities are, and where NAVCA's members are
The Charity Commission’s register records where every charity works. NAVCA publishes a map of its members — the councils for voluntary service, volunteer centres and other local organisations whose job is to support small charities and community groups. This puts the two side by side, council area by council area.
This is a map, not a service, and nobody here can give advice or funding. Your local council for voluntary service or volunteer centre is the place to start — find the one for your area under Find a member.
109,450local charities in England
Registered charities whose every recorded area of operation is a council area: the Charity Commission register’s own record.
146 of 152areas of England where a NAVCA member shows
Counties and unitary authorities where a member gives an address, or a member charity records working there.
98.9%of England's local charities name an area where a NAVCA member shows
Counted by the council areas each charity names on the register.
79,693of England's local charities have an income under £100,000
In their latest accounts, as the register records them.
What the register can see, and what it cannot
NAVCA says: “Our members support over 165,000 small charities and community groups across England”. The register records 109,450 charities in England that work only in named council areas, 79,693 of them with an income under £100,000. Most of the rest will be groups the register cannot see: too small to have to register, or never registered — the part of the sector NAVCA’s own work on its true size is about. This page can count only the part that is on the register.
Where NAVCA's members are
England’s counties and unitary authorities, split into five equal groups by the published measure of deprivation — the share of each area’s neighbourhoods in the most deprived tenth nationally.
| Deprivation | Areas | A NAVCA member shows |
|---|---|---|
| Least deprived fifth | 30 | 27 of 30 |
| Second | 30 | 29 of 30 |
| Middle | 31 | 30 of 31 |
| Fourth | 30 | 29 of 30 |
| Most deprived fifth | 31 | 31 of 31 |
NAVCA members show more often where deprivation is highest. One is present in 31 of the 31 most deprived areas and 27 of the 30 least deprived. That is a finding about where NAVCA members are, not about how much help anybody gets.
By kind of council
Every county and unitary authority, by the kind of council it is. London boroughs and metropolitan boroughs are the big cities and their conurbations; counties are mostly rural and small-town England; the unitary councils are a mix, many of them cities.
| Kind of council | Areas | A NAVCA member shows | Share of local charities living where one shows |
|---|---|---|---|
| London boroughs | 33 | 28 of 33 | 89.7% |
| Metropolitan boroughs | 36 | 35 of 36 | 98.7% |
| Unitary councils in England | 59 | 59 of 59 | 100.0% |
| Counties | 24 | 24 of 24 | 100.0% |
See the areas where no NAVCA member shows, and what that does not mean →
The members themselves
NAVCA’s member map shows 195 members. 169 distinct charities on the register stand behind them. The typical one — the median — reported income of £887,472 in its latest accounts: the whole charity’s income, including everything it runs for its council and others.
What this is for
Two readers, and they want different things.
- Somebody running a small charity or group. The member list is searchable here by the question they arrive with — I need help, I want volunteers — rather than by a postcode.
- Somebody arguing about local support for the voluntary sector. This counts where the members are against where the registered local charities are, council area by council area, rather than asserting either.
This was built without asking you, from information you and others already publish, to show what is possible rather than to speak for you. If you would rather it came down, say so and it comes down, and you do not have to give a reason. If you would rather it were built properly — with your own figures for the local groups each one works with — that is the more interesting conversation.