Prepared for Natspec by Adrian Taylor, 2026-10-05. If you work there and would rather this page came down, say so and it comes down.
Natspec: what the records show, and what we could do together
Adrian Taylor runs Charity in a Box, after twenty years working in charities and public services. About Adrian.
1. What you say, and where we read it
We read your website (Home Page - Natspec) and your public channels.
“We are a membership organisation for specialist colleges within the UK, and also provide training to the wider sector regarding young people with learning difficulties and / or disabilities.” (natspec.org.uk/about)
“Our mission and values Natspec exists to improve Further Education (FE) for students with learning difficulties and/or disabilities.” (natspec.org.uk/who-we-are)
Your channels: youtube (read); x (closed to readers, not read); linkedin (closed to readers, not read); facebook (closed to readers, not read); instagram (closed to readers, not read).
2. Young people with SEND, from outside
99 charities are in the field by name or membership. 2,313 other charities say in their own latest report that they serve the same people.
Young people with SEND99 charities
Education/training1,796
Disability694
General charitable purposes604
Economic/community developme…479
Health436
Poverty relief426
Arts, culture, heritage, sci…405
Amateur sport330
Recreation288
Religious activities239
Families with young children247
Young people86
Disability services34
Unpaid carers27
Learning disability26
Local infrastructure20
Youth centres17
Mental health15
the fieldother charities naming its people, by register purposeof those, in another field on this site
Your members against the rest of the field
Measure
Members
Rest of the field
Fragile (share)
48%
18%
Government-dependent (share)
87%
28%
Reserves, months (median)
3.6
2.7
Income change over returns, % (median)
48.4
69.2
Report names the people (share)
69%
31%
Areas with little or no presence of your network, those with the most residents on low incomes first: Newham, Barking and Dagenham, Blackpool, Blackburn with Darwen, Luton, Kingston upon Hull, Wolverhampton, Walsall, Rochdale, Leicester.
Researchers who studied how charities support people with dementia across the United Kingdom concluded:
“National and local data sources could help charities and commissioners begin to identify inequalities of provision.”
Mayrhofer, Goodman, Lafortune, Smeeton, Littlechild, Shora and Bunn, Voluntary Sector Review, first published 2021. Read the paper.
This page is that view for your field.
3. Sample campaign
Three posts in your voice from the figures above, each with its picture, ready to use. Every figure is from public information and no charity is named.
Bluesky / X: 2,313 charities outside young people with send say in their own reports that they serve the same people, against 99 in the field. Who they are, by what they do: https://www.charityinabox.uk/offers/natspec.html
LinkedIn: 2,313 charities outside young people with send say in their own reports that they serve the same people, against 99 in the field. Who they are, by what they do: https://www.charityinabox.uk/offers/natspec.html
Built from public information; no charity is named.
Bluesky / X: 48% of the network's members show under three months' reserves or three years of deficits, against 18% of the rest of the field. https://www.charityinabox.uk/offers/natspec.html
LinkedIn: 48% of the network's members show under three months' reserves or three years of deficits, against 18% of the rest of the field. https://www.charityinabox.uk/offers/natspec.html
Built from public information; no charity is named.
Bluesky / X: 41 of England's 152 county and unitary areas have little or no presence of the network for the people counted there; Newham, Barking and Dagenham, Blackpool first. https://www.charityinabox.uk/offers/natspec.html
LinkedIn: 41 of England's 152 county and unitary areas have little or no presence of the network for the people counted there; Newham, Barking and Dagenham, Blackpool first. https://www.charityinabox.uk/offers/natspec.html
Built from public information; no charity is named.
What your field can't see from inside it: the page on our site, in full, refreshed each quarter.
£1,500, £4,000 or £9,000 a year, by your income band, never negotiated
The members' licence
Each of your members gets its own view: where it stands beside the rest of the field, what is thin in its area, who else is at work there.
included in the year
A campaign from the findings
Posts and pictures in your voice from your field's own figures, for your channels.
£250 a month
The first month: a twenty-minute call, your page in full within a week, and the first campaign posts the week after. Prices are set by income band from the public register and are the same for everyone in the band.
5. How to say yes
Reply to the email with a day that suits, call or text Adrian on the number in the email (it is on the Contact page too), or write to adrian@charityinabox.uk.
What this can and cannot say. These are counts over groups of charities and places from their own returns and reports and from national statistics. They do not rank any charity, name any, or say why. A thin field is one where the known network is thin for the people counted here, not one where nobody is helped.
Built from public information: the Charity Commission for England and Wales register and the annual reports charities file with it (OGL v3.0); Census 2021 (ONS); the English Indices of Deprivation 2025 (MHCLG); the Claimant Count (ONS). Privacy.
