← Charity in a Box  ·  Free legal help

Free legal help › what the records show · drawn as a map of connections

Legal help: what the records show from outside

A body sees its own members and the people who reach them. Public records see every charity in England at once. This page sets the two side by side for legal help: who else does this work, where the network is thin, how exposed the field is, and how the people it serves are written about.

1. Who else does this work

320 charities in England are in this field by name or by membership. 840 other charities, outside it, say in their own latest annual report that they serve the same people: 72.5% of all the charities that name them. By what the register records them as doing:

Register purposeCharities outside the field naming the people
Education/training505
Poverty relief470
General charitable purposes389
Economic/community development, employment300
Health257
Disability235
Human rights, equality213
Other purposes157
Housing139
Arts, culture, heritage, science127
Amateur sport76
Recreation69

A charity records up to three purposes, so the rows overlap.

Among them, charities that are themselves in another of the fields on this site: 23 disability services; 17 food aid; 14 mental health; 9 local infrastructure; 9 veterans; 9 older people living alone; 8 homelessness; 8 befriending.

Of those outside the field, 29.1% show under three months’ reserves or three years of deficits, against 24.6% of the field itself.

2. Where the network is thin

69 of the 152 county and unitary areas of England record no presence of Law Centres Network’s network: no listed place, and no member charity recording the area. The median share of residents on low incomes in those areas is 24.7%, against 24.6% across England.

AreaShare of residents on low incomesThin in how many of 24 fields on this site
Newham39.7%12
Middlesbrough38.7%10
Barking and Dagenham38.6%16
Blackpool37.8%13
Sandwell37.7%9
Blackburn with Darwen37.4%12
Kingston upon Hull36.5%8
Wolverhampton36.3%13
Hartlepool36.3%16
Walsall35.9%13
Stoke-on-Trent33.3%12
Peterborough31.3%12
Sunderland31.2%8
North East Lincolnshire30.3%10
Rotherham29.9%8

The 15 with the most residents on low incomes are shown, of 69.

Across every field on this site, the areas thin in most of them: Isles of Scilly (17 of 21), Barking and Dagenham (16 of 24), Portsmouth (16 of 24), Hartlepool (16 of 25), Rutland (16 of 25), Thurrock (16 of 25), City of London (15 of 24), Havering (15 of 24), Hillingdon (15 of 24), Lambeth (14 of 24).

What this can and cannot say. A thin area is one where the body’s own listed places and its charities’ recorded areas of operation are few for the people counted there. It does not mean nobody there gets help: section 1 is the measure of who else is at work.

3. Money and exposure

Fragile means under three months’ reserves on the latest return, or spending above income for three years running. Government-dependent means half or more of income from government grants and contracts.

GroupCharitiesFragileReserves (months, median)Income change over returns (median)Donations share (median)
The field31824.8%4.319.6%0.9%
All other charities in England67,79020.8%4.439.7%29.4%
The field, government-dependent12824.2%4.713.7%0.7%
The field, not dependent19025.3%4.225.9%1.2%
The field, in the most deprived third of neighbourhoods15625.0%4.818.9%0.5%
The field, in the least deprived third3525.7%4.320.2%2.1%

40.0% of the field is government-dependent.

4. How the people are written about

Of the 990 charities whose latest report names people needing legal help, 17.5% write of them beside words of lack (vulnerable, struggling, crisis, hardship, isolated) and 24.4% beside words of what they bring (skills, work, leadership, confidence, potential, independence). Across every population on this site the sector’s figures are 23.4% and 25.5%. This field’s people are written about mostly by what they bring.

5. Law Centres Network’s members against the rest of the field

36 charities in the field are on Law Centres Network’s own list or record its membership; 284 are not.

MeasureMembersRest of the field
Fragile (share)27.8%24.5%
Government-dependent (share)50.0%38.7%
Reserves, months (median)4.24.4
Income change over returns, % (median)11.522.1
Donations share, % (median)10.9
Income, £ (median)898,313697,190
No income source over 60% (share)9.7%4.8%
Report names the people (share)100.0%40.3%
Writes of what they bring (share)91.7%34.2%

A figure is shown only for a group of five or more; a median is of the charities with the figure on their return.

What this can and cannot say. These are counts over groups of charities and places in England, from their own returns and reports and from national statistics. They show where a field stands beside the rest of the sector; they do not rank any charity, name any, or say why.

Sources

Built from public information: the Charity Commission for England and Wales register of charities and the annual reports charities file with it (Open Government Licence v3.0); the 2021 Census (Office for National Statistics, OGL v3.0); the English Indices of Deprivation 2025 (MHCLG, OGL v3.0); the Claimant Count (ONS). Figures are for England and are counts of groups of charities and of places; no charity is named.

Built 2026-10-03.


Questions or corrections
adrian@charityinabox.uk — Adrian Taylor. This page is a sample on a demonstration site. We wrote to the Law Centres Network on 24 September 2026 to tell them this exists. Beyond that, nothing has been sent to any organisation named on these pages, and none of them has agreed to appear.